Artistic research[ edit ] The controversial trend of artistic teaching becoming more academics-oriented is leading to artistic research being accepted as the primary mode of enquiry in art as in the case of other disciplines. As such, it is similar to the social sciences in using qualitative research and intersubjectivity as tools to apply measurement and critical analysis.
Paradigms, methods and methodology Noella Mackenzie and Sally Knipe Charles Sturt University In this article the authors discuss issues faced by early career researchers, including the dichotomy, which many research textbooks and journal articles create and perpetuate between qualitative and quantitative research methodology despite considerable literature to support the use of mixed methods.
The authors review current research literature and discuss some of the language, which Causal research methods prove confusing to the early career researcher and problematic for post-graduate supervisors and teachers of research.
The authors argue that discussions of research methods in research texts and university courses should include mixed methods and should address the perceived dichotomy between qualitative and quantitative research methodology.
Introduction Social scientists have come to abandon the spurious choice between qualitative and quantitative data; they are concerned rather with that combination of both which makes use of the most valuable features of each. However, many university courses and research texts continue to discuss research in terms of 'qualitative' or 'quantitative' methods.
When research is described in such terms, confusion may be created for the undergraduate student, first time or early career researcher. The research process is already a daunting prospect to the inexperienced researcher and the ongoing debate and contradictory information adds to the confusion.
This is further exacerbated by laypeople that continually ask researchers whether their research is qualitative or quantitative. By writing this article, the authors aim to assist first time and early career researchers make considered decisions about the type of study they may undertake, the process involved in undertaking a research project and the debates in the literature surrounding theoretical frameworks underpinning research.
Associated definitions and constructs will also be discussed. This article begins with a discussion of research paradigms, providing definitions and discussion of the role of paradigms in educational research. Paradigms receive varied attention in research texts. The role of the paradigm can, therefore, appear somewhat mysterious.
It is, therefore, a priority of this article to 'demystify' the role of paradigms in research. The article then moves to a discussion of methodology as it relates to the research paradigm. In some research discussions methodology appears to be central and may even be seen to replace what is in effect the pre-ordinate role of the paradigm.
In this article the authors discuss how the research paradigm and methodology work together to form a research study. The qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods debate is then discussed as it pertains to the decisions that need to be made by the researcher.
A diagram is provided to show the 'research journey' although the authors acknowledge that the research process is more cyclical than linear. More than 40 widely available research texts were reviewed during the preparation of this article, with particular attention given to the treatment of paradigms, methods and methodology.
Research paradigms Research has been described as a systematic investigation Burns, or inquiry whereby data are collected, analysed and interpreted in some way in an effort to "understand, describe, predict or control an educational or psychological phenomenon or to empower individuals in such contexts" Mertens,p.
It has been suggested, however, that the "exact nature of the definition of research is influenced by the researcher's theoretical framework" Mertens,p. It is the choice of paradigm that sets down the intent, motivation and expectations for the research.
Without nominating a paradigm as the first step, there is no basis for subsequent choices regarding methodology, methods, literature or research design.A wide range of research methods are used in psychology.
These methods vary by the sources from which information is obtained, how that information is sampled, and the types of instruments that are used in data collection.
Mixed methods research is a methodology for conducting research that involves collecting, analysing and integrating quantitative (e.g., experiments, surveys) and qualitative (e.g., focus groups, interviews) research.
This approach to research is used when this integration provides a better understanding of the research problem than either of each alone. Research Methods Handbook Introductory guide to research methods for social research Stuart MacDonald & Nicola Headlam, CLES CLES.
Posted by FluidSurveys Team August 20, Categories: Research Design, Best Practices.
We are at the final stop on our crash course on the three types of survey vetconnexx.com the last month we have gone over both exploratory and descriptive vetconnexx.com we will finish off our blog series by jumping into the world of causal research. Guide for Novice Researchers on Research Methodology study conducted and, by extension, the specific methods employed in conducting that type of.
social research methods core course b.a sociology iv semester ( admission) university of calicut school of distance education calicut university p.o., malappuram, kerala, india
|IIER Mackenzie and Knipe - research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology||Mixed method research has some disadvantages and limitations, namely: The research design can be very complex.|