The complexity of the notion of revolution

Microservices provide benefits… Strong Module Boundaries: Microservices reinforce modular structure, which is particularly important for larger teams. Simple services are easier to deploy, and since they are autonomous, are less likely to cause system failures when they go wrong. With microservices you can mix multiple languages, development frameworks and data-storage technologies.

The complexity of the notion of revolution

Analytic Philosophy | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

The methodology of comparative science and relational complexity is suggested to help in the construction and analysis of scientific theories. The progress of science is the discovery at each step of a new order which gives unity to what had seemed unlike.

Introduction The concept of the phenomenon of a dissipative structure has become an extremely useful concept in explaining how the world works. It appears that entities such as the Web, mankind, life, the earth, the solar system, the Milky way, and our universe are examples of this phenomenon [ Prigogine97Smolin97Langton80 ].

On the other hand, the fact that all of these massive dissipative structures must also exhibit replicative properties, has been one major failing of modeling in the scientific enterprise.

Lastly, I will suggest a methodology that can help in the construction and analysis of scientific theories. This use of the word "spontaneous" is analogous to the unjustified finesse in using the phrase "spontaneous generation" taken by pre-Pasteur scientists regarding life.

Because of this, I will generalize the notion of "dissipation" to include the notion of "thermodynamic. Moreover, one must admit that the universe is not in equilibrium, it is forever changing: This observation is key to understanding how the "evolution" of the our universe and its embedded structures will proceed.

The century old hypothesis of "heat death" of the universe, based on the second law of thermodynamics is no longer the most reasonable scenario because it appears that the universe is a non-equilibrium structure [ Smolin97 ].

Sorry! Something went wrong!

For one major flaw in the scientific enterprise has been the lack of a methodology for conceptual integration and analysis between "a system" and its context.

Viewing the universe as a "closed" or "isolated" system is no longer acceptable. When examining massive dissipative structures, such as galaxy systems, it is fairly clear now that a significant property of them has been primarily and largely ignored by the scientific community. The classic example is the creation of more atomic nuclei in stars which is a form of replication.

Moreover, certain quanta are considered "elementary particles" and in cosmology are posited, de novo, in the beginning of the big bang. De novo positing of billions of any kind of "string" or "particle," such as leptons, begs the question of their origin.

That replication of these structures occurred seems to be a more reasonable hypothesis, even though we may never know exactly how i. In addition, the property of dissipation has been largely de-emphasized in "living" massive replicative structures such as Gaia [ Lovelock87 ], Hypersea[ McMenanim94 ], and Metaman[Stock93].

But the relations between dissipation and replication are crucial in understanding how the world works. One of the problems has been that both processes, dissipation and replication, must go hand in hand when modeling natural systems, but explicit coupling has not been considered before.

It is posited that in reality e. For example, the current crisis in quantum mechanics the disconnect with relativity has lead several researchers [ Bohm93Smolin97Prigogine97Rosen91 ] to question the underlying characterization.

Particle physics has had to turn to cosmology and astrophysics to help in finding models of the creation and evolution of the microscopic entities based on the state of the entire universe. Also recently, the incompleteness of the neo-darwinian model of evolution has been exposed by questions posed by researchers, such as, Margulis and Lovelock on the relationship between the biosphere, the solar system, and life.

Finally, can the future of mankind be addressed without understanding the role of the Gaia [ Lovelock87 ] and Hypersea [ McMenanim94 ] hypotheses and their connection to the future evolution of the Internet and our future mind children?

On the other hand, scientific progress has been practically synonymous with the methodology of reductionism and the atomic hypothesis. If science is practically defined by the notions of "simplifying the problem" and analysis of the working of the parts of a system, then what techniques and methodologies are alternatives or additions to this most successful approach.

We have met the enemy and they are us. But, besides lamenting the sins of reductionism [Rosen 91] [Goodwin 96] [Oyama86] and pointing out its weaknesses, there needs to be a methodology for going beyond the criticism and helping to generate new ways of understanding and building conceptual models which include the both the characterization of context and the "system" of complex phenomena.

Rosen has pointed out the main problem with most scientific work lies in the characterization of the environment of the studied system. Or rather, he points out, the problem is the lack of characterization of the environment or "surrounding" context of the "system," by the "hidden" assumptions in the scientific models.

Robert Rosen suggested that current science is missing a major mode of entailment [Rosen91]. Although his argument is convincing for most who are familiar with it very few know about ithis prescription has been largely ignored.

Besides the fact that he suggests unconventional mathematics, category theory, relative to his audience, biologists, one possible reason for the lack of notice is that Rosen does not give a concrete methodology for constructing a theory of "the system" within its context.

Although, his approach and technique cannot be faulted, other than for its abstractness and dearth of concrete examples. Rosen rigorously shows the limits of current analytic science implicitly including quantum gravity and string theory symbolized by Newtonian physics and Turing computation.

He argues that science are not using all available modes of entailment in its fight against complexity. Current science avoids the why questions, for answering the why question could involve teleology.

Reductionistic science unnecessarily avoids asserting final cause because it does not want to be accused of asserting unjustified tautologies circular reasoning - "finite" or "infinite". However, in creating theory a model of reality which may correspond to reality, one must assert final cause to entail anything of significance.

Some mathematical systems, such as intuitionistic logic, do not assume the excluded middle. Rosen calls this fabrication of theory, a necessary part of science and mathematics.

He asserts that fabrication of the modeling relation his terminology for his particular representation of "theory" is an art.A recent trend in the literature has been to characterize healthcare activities in terms of complex systems theory.

Complexity has often been loosely and variously defined, with meanings ranging from “not simple” to “complicated” to “intractable.”. Both principles — complexity and immanence — merge on the site of what has been interpreted as an absence in Williams’s work: his supposed lack of a theory of modernity On one reading, of course, this is absurd; his entire oeuvre, structured as it is around the central notion of the long revolution, is nothing but an epic mapping out.

The complexity of the notion of revolution

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers" - it's a lawyer joke Seth Finkelstein [email protected] Few people are unfamiliar with the phrase The first thing we do, let's kill all the, mocking, it often expresses the ordinary person's frustration with the arcana and complexity of law.

As they fired back at their critics, defenders of slavery in antebellum America often maintained that slavery, as practiced in the South, was more humane than the system of “wage slavery” under which, they claimed, Northern and British industrial workers suffered.

I Googled “complexity revolution” a few times over the past few weeks. During that period, the number of hits went from 9, some to 12, And, I know that many, perhaps most,complexity theorists would contest the notion that thermodynamics is the core science of complexity.

Jul 06,  · The Fourth Industrial Revolution will also profoundly impact the nature of national and international security, affecting both the probability and the nature of conflict.

The history of warfare and international security is the history of technological innovation, and today is no exception.

The Surprising Origins of Evolutionary Complexity - Scientific American